Rooted in Power

Trees are complex and take the right conditions to grow into large prosperous organisms that take root in fertile soil. Macbeth’s soil was fertilized with his victories in battle but tainted with the poison of entitlement, so justly placed within his foundation of being by his lovely wife. Macbeth’s roots began to rot as his entitlement seeps deeper into his being intertwining itself with the core of his morality. The larger and more intense the flame the more it consumes and faster it burns out, the bigger the tree the more extensive the damage the roots do when it topples over. Macbeth uproots his society’s set of beliefs and challenges what authority and power mean if they can be claimed by someone who does not hold them through birthright. Tragedy is greatest when the innocent are caught in the crossfire that they had no way of avoiding; the only contributing factor they played was existing. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth give it no thought that the king and his sons played no part in gaining their own power, born scepter hand at the ready never knowing empathy towards other classes besides their own. Macbeth has killed and had others kill for his power, he fought for what he had but showed that no matter the means you used to achieve your power humans are still easily corrupted. Even the most morally rigid of us would compromise a belief or two if any want or desire could be theirs. Anyone who associates with the powerful whether they play active roles in the consumption of power or those who just retain it are targets. Lady Macduff was a bystander in a war she didn’t initiate but was slaughtered along with her children based solely off of association. Tragedy is fighting for what you think is right and then having everything you were fighting for taken, leaving you to self-serving motives like revenge that is backed by emotion or pride.

Sound-Color Synesthesia

One of my favorite types of Synesthesia is sound-color because it’s always fun to space out and watch while I’m bored. In the simplest of terms sound-color synesthesia is when my brain processes sound and the signals flow to the visual processing section of my brain creating visual input out of the sounds that I’m experiencing. Different tones correlate with the hues of the colors; a deeper sound would have a darker tone while a softer or higher note will usually have a lighter hue. I haven’t found a correlation between the color and sound because while synesthesia is largely based on association the colors of such sounds are usually subject to random association. The shape of the colored sound is mostly subject to its pitch and where it’s originating from, spatially I see the color originating from where the sound is coming from, Ex: when someone is speaking I see the color coming out of their mouth, and if I’m not looking at them then I see the color coming from where they are. This is particularly hard to describe in terms others understand because it is a means of perception that I’ve had since birth, and usually I can only fully explain it to someone who also has synesthesia. Sounds usually have shapes that flow and either dissolve into nothingness or continue on until I can’t see them anymore. The size of the sound is connected to the how loud it is. Ex: when I wear headphones everything in my visual field has colored shapes flowing around it overlapping with what my eyes are actually seeing. Thankfully I’m able to view what my eyes are physically seeing separately from what my synesthesia is creating, without this I’d probably not be very good at seeing because what I see would always be flooded with the sound that I’m hearing. Any questions that are needed for clarification are welcome and the next synesthesia based post will be coming soon.

Study Questions

These are the study questions we worked on in class together and talked about with each other.

I-1

1) Beginning the play with a dialogue between the witches sets the mood to be dark, evil, and mysterious. This foreshadows the plot, theme, and mood for the future of the story in the same manner. In comparison of Shakespeare’s other plays, Macbeth requires more ambiguity and the syntax and diction used needs to be more bleak. For example, Hamlet highlighted the themes of betrayal and complexity of relationships and power. Even though, the theme falls in the same ballpark with Macbeth, the gloominess of the plot of Macbeth overpowers that of Hamlet. In the beginning of the play, the witches were going to meet Macbeth at the “ere of sunset.” Line 10 was “Paddock calls” and line 11 was “Anon.” The phrase paddock class means a toad, which symbolizes transformation. The word anon means soon or shortly. The “toad” and it’s transformation could metaphorically be compared to Macbeth and his evolving and transforming to be a completely different person or even having a transformation in his status and power. The witch’s response as anon signifies how Macbeth will shortly have a transformation – to be declared a thane. 

I-2

1. The bloody seargent indirectly characterizes Macbeth by glorifying his actions towards Macdonwald. Macdonwald is a rebel who was executed. He tried to attack them. Macbeth executed macdonwald with his sword. This did not end the fight with the rebels, the Norwegians are still attacking.
2. The traitor was the Thane of Cawdor, as we learn from Ross. Duncan says that its a relief the thane of cawdor was executed and that Macbeth now owns his previous title.

I-3

1. The witches speech gives a first look at Macbeth and his wife without saying who they are. Indirect characterization of the two. Similar to Hamlet where he gives a mini synopsis early in the story. “Weird” in Shakespeare’s day meant future seers not weird as we know it, prophecy and destiny. Shakespeare means that Macbeth’s wife has him by the balls. They  cast a spell to control his destiny. 
2. Macbeth says something very similar to what the witches said at the beginning of the play. This could be him falling into the destiny the witches set up. Dried, chapped fingers, gender ambiguity, hairy, old, they have literal beards. The witches tell Macbeth that he will thane of Candor and eventually King, right then he finds out he is thane of Cawdor. Banquo asked the witch why they had nothing for him, they told him he is lesser but greater than Macbeth. We knew he was thane before he was thane.
3. Banquo says the witches were a figment of their imagination that they lie or that they are hallucinating. Macbeth learns that he is thane of Cawdor from Ross and Angus. During lines 114-156 he was going over his plan in his head and how everything had just happened to him. He acts very happy and shows no incredulity at being thane. Macbeth’s aside shows him rationalizing what happened to him and he begins to think that he is going to be King soon. Macbeth tells Banquo that he is happy and excited and nothing more he explains his behavior by saying he is confused.

I-4

1.Cawdor was executed after openly confessing his treason and pleading for mercy. Malcolm tried to stick up for the thane, but the king responds by basically saying that you can’t trust a man according to his face. He doesn’t believe the thane was truly repentant.

2.The king greets them by saying that he can never repay them enough for their good deeds, but announces he will leave all his estate and names his son, Malcolm, prince of Cumberland. He then proposes that they go to Macbeth’s castle at Inverness. Macbeth tells himself that the only way to be king is to get rid of Malcolm, and even though he’ll be appalled at his action, he must do it.

I-5

1. Macbeth was honest with his wife when he informs her of his new title as “Thane of Cawdor.” He refers to the witches as “weird sisters” probably because he doesn’t want her know that he is associated with the “evil servants.”

Lady Macbeth responds by saying that she thinks Macbeth is playng things off as if everything is fine. By saying “but be the serpent under’t”, she describes him as someone that lies to make everything appear under control. This doesn’t really match the characterization of Macbeth so far in the story which implies that there is something the audience doesn’t know about him. 

2. The wife was confident about the guests visit. She also seemed prepared and a little cocky about the way her and her husband would handle it.

3. Lady Macbeth. Yes she wants to kill Duncan. No, he isn’t sure whether he wants to follow through with Lady Macbeths orders or not. She tells him not to let Duncan see tomorrow. 

4. The question appears to answer itself. 

I-6

1. The opening speeches (1.6.1-10) describe how the surroundings of the castle are “pleasant” and the air is sweet-maybe even too sweet. From the outside, the castle appears to be paradise.
Lady Macbeth’s welcome is formal. Her language is totally different from her language in the previous scene which shows how fake and dishonest her welcome was.

I-7

1. “If it were done when ’tis done then ’twere well.” If it were done when it was done it was done well. (Meaning if he completed the death quickly and efficiently and with no complications then he did the job well.) Macbeth is determined to kill the king and be done with him but in lines 1-12 he is fearful of how the “inventor” will judge his actions. He’s violating the hospitality of his kinship and responsibilities as a host towards his guest by trying to kill his guest instead of protecting them. The motivation that Macbeth attributes to himself in lines 25-28 is the attribute of an Arabic heaven-like God. He will be seen as a “God” and that is his source of motivation to get the job done. 

2. In lines 28-30 she is complaining about him leaving the chamber because it was  almost time for dinner. Macbeth responds to her complaining by saying did he ask for me? And lady Macbeth says don’t you know he did? The positions are lady Macbeth is ready for the King to be killed while Macbeth is still hesitant and on the fence about it. Macbeth convinced Lady Macbeth by explaining that he is an respected person and doesn’t want to lose his honor while Lady Macbeth convinces Macbeth by convincing him to gain the power and kill the king. The stronger person in the scene is Lady Macbeth because  she’s more verbally confident in her argument while convincing Macbeth to kill the King. 

Meet Macbeth

Macbeth is indirectly characterized by having his physical appearance and his actions show that he is a royal but still able to bring death to his opponents as shown by the description of his bloody blade. The witches basically lay out Macbeths future and saying that he’ll get the crown but not without bloodshed. Shakespeare’s characterization of Macbeth reflects an almost mocking tone as his wife makes jabs at his masculinity which in former European societies was seen as everything a man should strive for. An evident theme throughout Macbeth’s character and conduct is some sense of entitlement and reliance on his friends and the people beneath his power.

I felt a Funeral, in my Brain by: Emily Dickinson

I’m using the 1970 prompt structure and then conveying the author’s attitude towards death

Ms. Dickinson is describing how she would possibly feel at her future funeral. telling the readers that the service had the likeness of a drum repetitive and ongoing almost droning on to keep pace so that the funeral can end in a timely fashion and the people can get back to their hum drum life and wait till they get to see their own drum beat funeral. Ms. Dickinson’s mind is going numb possibly from under stimulation as she believes that maybe no one will care to say anything less than superficial at her funeral and that she was less than understood. Feeling the toll of space as she is moved lower into the ground so some plants are denied her body because she is wrapped in their dead brothers. Heaven being on its own its own frequency and her and silence being the absence of one feeling as though she won’t be able to attain her version of heaven as though it was purposefully made to exclude her and silence together. Lastly she says that a plank of reason breaks letting her escape and fall through various realities and at the very least attaining closure. She wants to believe that she will have closure after her death even if she does not get to become part of her heaven. Ms. Dickinson believes that death is an inevitability that maybe you won’t die with people having known the real you and the only thing you should hope for are answers once you’re on the other side.

Mr. Goodman’s Not So Good Life

Every conversation felt forced and rough not having the ability to ever fully trust your neighbor or your once trustworthy pastor, these are some of the challenges that Mr. Goodman Brown gets to deal with on a daily basis. Doubt is eating away at Mr. Goodman’s mind and will influence his actions throughout the rest of his life in minor ways that will build a wall between his thoughts and actions. Mr. Goodman is going to conform and play along to everyone’s tune because he’s still not quite sure if what he saw in the forest is real but if he’s wrong and it was real then once he stops going along with the act people will start to take notice; as everyone eventually does when someone decides to step out of their line composed of social norms.

Doubt’s the decaying feeling that eats at your brain and changes your perception of others, every word every movement is up for speculation because you’re never quite sure. Trust would be one of the first feelings to leave, feeding into widening the cracks between oneself and others. Mr. Goodman goes the rest of his life without asking others if they were there that night and probably chalks it up as a vivid nightmare but part of him still wants a straight answer from his peers, full well knowing that if this question was ever seriously asked he may be subject to the town’s fury. Either they tear him apart because he know what truly goes on in the ancient forest or because they think that he may have been touched by the devil. Tension starts with a large rip and moves to making smaller more discreet tears in the characters resolve. Once the Character’s resolve is torn they have no further business pretending to be sane.

That’s Not Blood, Or Is It?

Grief

Well since a few of my peers who also happen to draw have uploaded some of their creations to their blog I joined the small trend, I do however post majority of my pieces to my Instagram account but that’s another post entirely. For this piece I put Lilies everywhere because I love flowers and also because these flowers are usually given to people in times of intense emotional grief usually after the death of a loved one, which I thought went well with the expression of the person that I drew. I love all the symbolism one flower can portray because they are usually soaked in history and the tales of multiple cultures. Well I might do something like this in the future or not I guess you’ll have to see as of right now I have to go draw flowers for a birthday.

Tobermory Theme and Tone

The tone being projected through the last line is a sociopathic bit of maliciousness. basically this person regards Cornelius with the same level of respect he gave to the cat that was slaughtered, taking delight in this event if only for the fact that his social position would not be able to survive if others actually knew the truth behind the liquor soaked mask, that he wears at parties to give the guests an opportunity to flex their forced social graces that become more sloppy and unrefined with each glass of poison;
they so eagerly let soak in their hollow throats. The theme this lovely story exudes is that  intellect is power that can be shared through various means such as a cat and then a murderous elephant, but those who put that power on display and expose others lack of power are subject to harsh consequences. The cycle continues and once again the creator falls victim to his own craft.

Outward Conformity

The disconnect between ones actions and thoughts is a red flag for numerous psychological illnesses and the major cause of this disconnect is societal norms and enforced thinking that leads to conformity, Bernard from Huxley’s “Brave New World” thinks as though he wishes we could go against the “normal” society he lies in because he desires more then what the utopia is presenting him. This makes him question if a society that could make him feel as such is really that perfect. Friction starts to manifest in the form of his actions contributing to his actual thoughts he then conforms and submits even as his underdeveloped morals struggle to grasp deeper concepts beyond his taught right and wrong. Even though Bernard is supposed to be unopposed and the alpha he succumbs to others wishes and puts his thoughts in a secondary position. Bernard is a coward disguised as a pursuer of more but how can one pursue their desires if the only ever implement them in theory, Bernard’s inner self greatly juxtaposes his outer self-creating a contrast that is almost contradictory enough to make his two half’s separate entities with separate goals and personalities separated by a chasm of pressure built up for generations by the government and put into action by the citizens themselves creating a cycle of unfulfilled wants.

If someone’s actions mirrored their own thoughts the world would be full of serial killers and millionaires, not all desires are positive or morally right most fall into the grey and people are usually defined by which desires they act on such as the positive ones that benefit the majority, these people are regarded a hero’s of sorts and those who do the opposite and go towards the more morally grey or dark they end up in the villain category. But there is a vast majority of people who fall into neither category and end up in a category that is mostly neutral but with that neutrality comes with the price of being the enabler of those who have more radical or stronger connections to their more extreme desires. Bernard is in the passive category while his inner self would fall into a more radical category that would want to take action. Morals are used as the wiring that strings together our thoughts and connects those thoughts to the reality that is desired, they either allow the desire to materialize in the form of an action or deny it access to the outside world which means the thought is still their but it was never acted upon letting it fester within the individuals mind or assimilate with the morals and become part of the larger mechanism governing the body. Bernard becomes a prime example of what happens when someone relinquishes their control to a power they believe to be above them in this case the government which becomes their morals the brake or the accelerator controlling their thoughts and actions what makes them an individual. Some minds become one with this set of morals that has been instilled and others fight against it and intern themselves in Bernard’s case. This contributes to “Brave New Worlds” meaning which can be interpreted as your thoughts become your actions and your morals act the mediator between the two speaking on behalf of individual thinking as other morals can act as viruses infecting your psyche and what Huxley regarded as your being everything that makes someone themselves and draws the line between the individual and the masses.

Don’t Judge a Book by its Color, Personality-Color Synesthesia

Meeting somebody for the first time while experiencing synesthesia is comparable to trying to have a conversation with someone while noiseless fireworks go off behind their head and their personality is oozing all over your skin along with the occasional bits of flame like color making the appearance between their teeth as they begin to introduce themselves. Usually I experience a much more subtle version of this when I meet the occasional stranger but there are plenty of times when I just stare at the colors coming off of someone and they just think  I’m kind of out of it which I probably am. I like exploring the colors that someone presents through their being it’s a little puzzle my mind concocts that means a lot more than any of my spoken thoughts could ever truly represent. To break this down into the different types of synesthesia I’ll start off with personality-color synesthesia. We all have some form of a personality some a little duller then others and when I mean dull I’m mean their personality is literally presented to me in a color palette that seems to be dim. Every person has their own shade and color/colors that comprise their very own personality in my head, they all move take shape and react in their own way usually mimicking the individual to some extent though there are cases were the personality does not match the individuals actions this is usually in my mind because the person is either deceitful or manipulative in my opinion. Other than that personality colors can mean a variety of things, you could be pink because of a dominant personality trait you possess or you could be light blue just because it feels right. Personality colors usually remain the same unless there is a large shift in someone’s character or my perception of them has changed greatly for the better or the worse. Personalities also can have connection like bonds that seem to intermingle with another person’s color that they either like or dislike much like a flame interacting with another giving both the chance to combine for a short while or burn each other out, I mean this visually as it does sometimes look like colored flames or shapes bridging gaps between people and interacting. Another thing that happens is when people spend large amounts of time with each other ex: couples, siblings, and friends. their personality colors interact more often and then leave bits of color on each other long after interacting probably due to the fact that as hyper social beings we tend to take on the traits of those closest to us and this is my minds way of identifying the source in that person. In my next synesthesia post I’ll talk about sound-color synesthesia, thanks for reading have a bright orange evening.